Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank 1987-2006 by Simon Dunstan

By Simon Dunstan

The Challenger 2 is the present major conflict Tank of the British military and represents the end result of eighty years of tank layout. In 1987, its layout was once awarded to the Ministry of Defence according to a demand to exchange the Chieftain MBT that have been partly outdated by way of the Challenger 1 MBT. construction begun in 1993, and the tank eventually entered provider in 2002. The tank lately seemed in Iraq, the place it proved crucial throughout the conflict of Basra. This publication covers the evolution of the Challenger 2, from its origins and trying out to its involvement within the heart East and Iraq.

Show description

Read or Download Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank 1987-2006 PDF

Similar conventional books

German Armoured Cars

Color schemes Technical requisites DEPOSITили

Roman military equipment

Rome's upward push to empire is frequently acknowledged to have owed a lot to the potency and armed forces ability of her armies and their technological superiority over barbarian enemies. yet simply how 'advanced' was once Roman army apparatus? What have been its origins and the way did it evolve? The authors of this booklet have collected a wealth of facts from everywhere in the Roman Empire's excavated examples in addition to pictorial and documentary assets to give an image of what diversity of kit will be on hand at any given time, what it can seem like and the way it may functionality.

T-34/76

• comprises unfastened decals and covering foil• full of colour photosThe T-34 medium tank is among the most-produced and longest-lived tanks of all time. identity of T-34 variations will be complex. Turret castings, superficial information, and kit differed among factories. New positive aspects have been further in the course of creation runs or retrofitted to older tanks.

Additional resources for Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank 1987-2006

Sample text

This argument is admittedly artificial, as production quality is integral to the value of a weapon. Nothing turns a soldier against a firearm as much as problems with reliability, and the M1 Garand was noted for its robust resilience to everything the battlefield could throw at it. Had the Gew 43 come earlier in the war, and had chance to go through another couple of phases of improvement, it might well have been one of the conflict’s exceptional firearms. The other factor mitigating against the Gew 43 was the simple equation of distribution.

The Germans have struck a balance between the weight limitations of the machine carbine and the power and pressure requirements of the rifle or light machine gun. (US War Dept 1944b) The quotation accurately sums up the virtues of the FG 42, and notes its ‘versatility’ as a weapon that could straddle the demands of a submachine gun (machine carbine), rifle and even light machine gun. It also dwells upon the gun’s accuracy, a virtue of its ‘straight-in-line’ design that channelled the force of recoil on a direct line through the stock and into the soldier’s shoulder.

Pegler 2006: 195) Note that like Allerberger, Kramer made a conscious swap of his boltaction rifle for the semi-auto Gew 43. This suggests that those issued with the Gew 43 might have used the semi-auto weapon alongside a Kar 98k or Gew 98, to give themselves tactical flexibility suited to the challenges facing them. Those snipers who opted to use the B-Patrone ammunition would have had to alter the zero of the rifle before doing so, the explosive round having different ballistic properties compared to the standard ball cartridge.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.83 of 5 – based on 10 votes