Democracy's Arsenal: Creating a Twenty-First-Century Defense by Jacques S. Gansler

By Jacques S. Gansler

A professional explains why the safety wishes of the twenty-first century require a change of the protection of the 20 th century.

Show description

Read or Download Democracy's Arsenal: Creating a Twenty-First-Century Defense Industry PDF

Similar conventional books

German Armoured Cars

Color schemes Technical requisites DEPOSITили

Roman military equipment

Rome's upward push to empire is frequently stated to have owed a lot to the potency and armed forces ability of her armies and their technological superiority over barbarian enemies. yet simply how 'advanced' was once Roman army apparatus? What have been its origins and the way did it evolve? The authors of this ebook have accrued a wealth of proof from all around the Roman Empire's excavated examples in addition to pictorial and documentary resources to offer an image of what diversity of kit will be on hand at any given time, what it's going to appear like and the way it may functionality.

T-34/76

• comprises unfastened decals and overlaying foil• jam-packed with colour photosThe T-34 medium tank is among the most-produced and longest-lived tanks of all time. identity of T-34 versions could be advanced. Turret castings, superficial information, and kit differed among factories. New positive aspects have been additional in the midst of creation runs or retrofitted to older tanks.

Extra info for Democracy's Arsenal: Creating a Twenty-First-Century Defense Industry

Example text

Considering these options in inverse order, a significant number of firms simply exited the defense business. In the high-technology companies, these included California Microwave, GTE, Hughes Electronics, IBM, Lucent, Magnavox, Phillips, and Texas Instruments. In the large industrial companies, there were Allegheny, Teledyne, Chrysler, Eaton, Emerson, Ford, General Electric (except jet engines), Tenneco, and Westinghouse. Because of the complexity of government rules (ranging from specialized accounting to concerns about propriety rights), many technology-rich companies (such as Hewlett Packard, 3-M, and Corning) declined to participate in critical research and development projects of the Defense Department, even though they continued to sell their commercial products to the DoD.

Plants 14 Chapter 2 had adequate production capacity to build the missiles. But individual parts were required to increase the Patriot production rate, and surge planning had not included the parts. There was an eighteen-month delay in obtaining these parts. Clearly, planning for surge production of these systems had been inadequate. Until World War I, the Minuteman model of mobilizing manpower in response to war was the nation’s planning approach. After World War II, planning anticipated large surges in the production of ships, planes, and tanks.

Government Printing Office, 2007). The Defense Industry in Perspective 23 done to achieve significant reductions without loss of national security. Most of the total DoD budget is divided approximately equally among the army, navy, and air force (with the air force usually slightly higher because of the high costs of individual aircraft and aircraft maintenance, particularly jet engines). The army is far less capital-intensive than the air force, and the major share of the army’s costs goes to personnel.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 43 votes